Westminster Abbey and Lady Margaret Beaufort

Over Christmas break I photographed my first monuments, which I just edited and put online. I learned that I have a lot to learn.

The first monument I photographed was that of Margaret Beaufort, mother of Henry VII. She died in 1509 and was memorialized in bronze by Italian sculptor Pietro Torrigiano; he made the effigies of Henry VII and Elizabeth of York, so I knew the quality would be exceptional. Because Margaret was a vowess, her head covering is different – more like a widow – and since I want to recreate married woman’s dress, I’d never made seeing her effigy in Westminster a priority.

My mother-in-law and I visited Westminster Abbey  while the boys were in school. It is easy to get to, but with a £16 admission cost I needed either company who wanted to tour the Abbey or some reason to prioritize the visit. Also, the Abbey forbids photographs, and I’m not ready to write for permission to photograph in places that normally forbid it. First I need more experience visiting churches where I don’t have to get it right the first time.

The site advises budgeting an hour and a half to tour, but we spent more than twice that, listening to every stop along the audio tour. As we walked, I pointed out common themes and interesting features of the funerary art. There is a large Victorian brass on which the figures wear armor and costume from the mid-fifteenth century – but the lettering (and date) are 19th century. There were some unlabeled medieval effigies whose  anonymity tormented me. The Glastonbury chair with the patina of age made me smile…our chairs are well made, but I doubt they will ever look so venerable. The mosaic floor of semiprecious stones in front of the altar really drew my eye. I could only recognize the iconography on some of the saints; I should review my art history.

I realized almost immediately why photographs are forbidden – although it wasn’t unpleasantly crowded, the flow of tourists would be nearly impossible if people stopped to snap images or to avoid stepping into another person’s photograph. I honestly felt relieved that I could not possibly document the wonders I was beholding, because there were so many things to photograph, I would have taken all day just to make it out of the transept.

There are three early Tudor monuments with effigies at Westminster Abbey: Gyles 1st Lord Daubeney (+1508) and wife Elizabeth, Margaret Beaufort (+1509), and Henry VII (+1509) and Elizabeth of York (+1503). The latter three figures I knew reasonably well from the quality online images and the replicas of Henry VII and Elizabeth of York on the stairs at the National Portrait Gallery. I also knew that the original effigies of the king and queen would be obscured by a decorative metal screen. The first monument – Gyles and Elizabeth – I could only find a small image and snippet about online, but I doubted it would yield much costume data.

When we made it to Gyles, I found a beautiful and well-preserved monument. If I cared for armor I would have studied his form, but hers was not what I sought. The lady wears a medieval sideless surcoat, a fashion that I believe did more to indicate her rank for posterity than to reflect actual clothing she may have worn in her lifetime; a cloak further obscures the details of her dress. Her hair is down and flowing under a strange coif that I do not know how to interpret. The brim is thick, like a wreath or the turned-up edge of a knitted winter cap. I believe that as I explore other monuments, I may find actual wreaths of carved stone leaves; her style is neither the norm nor an anomaly.  The top of the coif is an ornate net, probably decorated with pearls or beads at the intersections of the threads. Is this a fanciful object that, like the sideless surcoat, conveyed a message to contemporary observers? Is this a style of headwear she sported in life? I don’t know, but it was not the hood or transitional English gown I came to photograph, so I admired the monument, puzzled out the inscription, and moved on.

Next we passed Henry VII and Elizabeth of York. Thank goodness I had spent plenty of time studying them at the National Portrait Gallery, for they are almost invisible behind the screen.

Margaret of Beaufort’s effigy came next, and here a familiar sight yielded fresh new ideas. My mother-in-law stood patiently while I talked through what I had never seen before, and theorized about possible construction methods. She supplied pen and paper with which to sketch the headdress, and helped me estimate the dimensions of different points on the effigy. The most fascinating feature was that the cloth around Margaret’s face folds under itself, creating a smooth edge to the front of the veil by layers of fabric, instead of folding back to reveal a lining, a technique familiar to me from other 15th-16th century hoods.

After soaking in all that I could of Margaret Beaufort, I continued the tour, jittery with the excitement of discovery. I wanted photos to refer to when, months or years hence, I attempt to recreate that hood. When we returned our audio guides and stepped outside to the cloisters, I stopped. I had to ask for permission; if they said no, I’d just be where I was now, with no photos. I asked. My interest in the effigy for researching historical costume seemed good enough to the staff member, because he assigned a cheerful young volunteer to go with me, and I got to take my photos. I promised I only needed two or three shots – odd angles like looking down at the crown of her head, not the views I could buy in the gift shop – but my companion urged me to take as long as I needed. I explained what I was doing, and what I was seeing, as I photographed, and she suggested additional shots (Have you gotten her shoes? How about that deer thing at her feet? Do you need one of the other side?) We discussed Margaret Beaufort, and what an incredible lady she was. It was simply delightful.

Afterward I rejoined my mother-in-law, toured quickly through the gardens and the cloisters, finished the last little bit of the tour where one passed the coronation chair, and we made our way toward Tom and lunch and a tour of the London Google offices.

The Simple Beauty of a Map

Last November I enjoyed several weeks devouring books at the National Art Library and the British Library, but then I stopped going out, and I stopped posting. Why the quiet? I was crunching data. (And Christmas happened, with three straight weeks of visiting grandparents, during which time everyone in my family got sick with annoying upper respiratory afflictions; we’re all better now.)

I’ve been thinking recently about what qualifies me to do embark on this research project, and I think it might be simply my skill at doing research and managing data. I’m certainly not trained or exceptionally talented as a costume designer, seamstress/tailor, photographer, cultural historian or art historian. I’m not even particularly skilled at web design, for sharing my findings online. The only time my biology background has been of even the remotest use is when I noticed someone incorrectly capitalizing the scientific names of animals used as fur in the sixteenth centuries. As anyone familiar with my penchant for volunteering can testify, I can organize, I can collect data, and I can process that data to get things done. So I suppose it is only natural that I’ve attacked this church monument photographing project not by driving through the countryside with a camera, but with spreadsheets and maps.

The libraries provided me with the software I used to create my starting database of monuments and brasses. I set up a spreadsheet and started sorting, deleting, organizing, classifying. I created Pinterest boards for all the funerary monument and brass images I could find online, so that I could better determine which churches were most worth visiting. Using this data, I rated the monuments and made an initial classification of the clothing styles represented on each.

Then I tracked down church data. Websites, contact info, open hours or keyholder information (when available), addresses (mostly “Church Street, name of town” although often the name of the town is somewhat questionable, as little hamlets are for postcode purposes classified as belonging to larger nearby towns. I honestly have no idea how mail carriers keep from going nuts.) and — most challenging of all, exact latitude and longitude. I did this step twice, once quickly finding a lat/long for each town, and then this past week I spent two days painstakingly using Google Maps to find the latitude and longitude that would place a little arrow right on top of the church I wanted to visit. Sometimes this was easy, because the church had already been officially added to Google Maps. Sometimes this involved finding the little town and then skimming the satellite view until I located what was most likely the church (I looked for the regular pattern of small shadows that indicated a graveyard) and going to streetview to verify that I was indeed looking at a church, not a large community hall. You would think that steeples and bell towers would be good clues, but they don’t show up well in satellite view, and only a few of the churches I hunted were large enough to have the cross-shaped transept.

I recruited my wonderful and patient husband to figure out how to create a custom Google Map (and to help me debug it every time I made changes and broke it), and this is my result: Map of Monumental Effigies of Women from between 1475 and 1550, rated by color (green is best quality, light blue second best, dark blue third, and very worn/poor quality effigies are excluded). To me this map is beautiful, useful, crammed with data. But when I think of how much time and effort this map took to create, or at least the data to be collected, it seems like a pitiful result. So I wouldn’t write another blog post until I’d gotten a little more done.

After all the work I’d put into making that map, I thought I should finally write up more clearly what I’m trying to research, where and how I’m looking for data, and what I’ve learned so far. This meant many hours spent frowning over my website, trying to write summaries about subjects in which I have no expertise, such as illumination and portraiture and church monuments. It meant lots of searching my head for sources, because I took only fair notes last fall during my library days, and none of them had yet been transcribed. It was, as I hoped it would be, motivation to better document what I’ve learned so far and how I know what I know.

Going through my library notes reminded me of books I want to purchase, so I placed a couple orders at AbeBooks.co.uk. Finally, I found something that costs LESS in the UK than it does in the States — niche books about English art and costume history that were published in the UK! Huzzah! This makes me want to find used bookstores and go browsing for more…or go to the library and better ascertain which tempting titles are truly worthy of purchase. I need to update my LibraryThing catalog…if I buy books too quickly, this might be useful for me to be able to check when I’m out at a store so that I can remember what I’ve found so far.

But this is somewhat of a distraction: the most important thing for me to do, now that I have a working map, is to figure out where I’m going to go look for monuments, and then do it. I’ve already started just a little bit.